pskawinski

pskawinski

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Effectiveness of hand pulling #1546
    pskawinski
    Participant

    Manual removal is a great option for any aquatic invasive plant. Grand Lake is a perfect example. Any bulbils left behind will sprout new plants, but yes, the supply of bulbils could be exhausted over time if each new plant / sprouted bulbil is removed before it can grow into a plant and produce more. A few fragments/bulbils will be left behind no matter what you do, whether you’re removing starry stonewort, Eurasian watermilfoil, narrow-leaf cattail, or anything else. The key to success is vigilance and working within your limits. Start small and be thorough. A common mistake with manual removal of AIS is trying to tackle a population that is too large from the beginning. The crew gets discouraged by slow progress and then gets sloppy, resulting in poor results.

    in reply to: Effectiveness of hand pulling #1544
    pskawinski
    Participant

    Manual removal can be a great option for any aquatic invasive plant, but keep in mind that SSW can regenerate from bulbils or fragments, so you would need to be very careful to get the entire plant each time. If you leave anything behind, you will not have accomplished much. This could be quite challenging at 7-10ft deep unless you have SCUBA gear or use a diver-assisted suction harvesting (DASH) system. Snorkeling to 7-10ft deep for plant removal is doable but challenging.

    However you do this, you must reach down into the sediments by a few inches to lift the plant from the bottom. This will lift the bulbils out and keep the main thallus (stem) of the plant from breaking under stress. Simply yanking the plant from the top will likely break the stem and leave many bulbils behind. SSW tends to grow in soft sediments, so reaching into the sediments to dislodge the plant/bulbils is usually not difficult.

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)